Archives For Evangelism

Spanish Evangelism Testimony 8.17.13

August 17, 2013

One of my Spanish guitar students and I witnessed for 1 ½ hours today to a family from Honduras. Mrs. C was very friendly and invited us in as soon as we walked up to the fence around their home. Her husband briefly greeted us before we entered the home but did not come in at all to talk with us.

Mrs. C shared how she has had a number of bad experiences with churches and professing Christians in the past. She bitterly decried the hypocrisy of some of the Christians that she has known.

My evangelism partner did most of the talking because he is a native Spanish speaker. He repeatedly tried to steer the conversation away from her complaints about the Christians that she has known but she would keep coming back to them.

As their conversation continued, I was able to understand that she was very upset with what she has seen of Christianity in the past. Sensing that we needed to give her some Scripture that would challenge her about her own need, I asked my partner to read the parable of the Pharisee and the publican to her.

As he led her through the parable and then explained its application to her, there was a marked change in her interaction with us. God used His Word to challenge her about her own sinfulness!

My partner was able to explain to her how Christ was the propitiation for our sins, which was shocking to her. Apparently, she had never heard anyone explain that glorious truth to her before our visit with her.

While my partner continued to witness to her, I was able to witness in English to her 11-year old daughter Y. Her daughter attends church fairly regularly and seems to be a believer.

I was able to help her think clearly about what God has done for her so that her sins have been forgiven through her faith in Jesus. I also helped her think through the main truths of John 3:16 and challenged her briefly about going on with the Lord as a believer.

Before we left, we prayed with both of them about a special need that they have in their family. We are very thankful to have had this excellent witnessing opportunity this morning!

As the Lord brings it to mind, please pray for the salvation of Mr. and Mrs. C.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Spanish, Testimony
 permalink

Is Your Evangelism Lacking Testimony to a Key Cosmic Element?

July 24, 2013

Much evangelism today testifies exclusively to human sinfulness and to how God has provided a way for people to have their sins forgiven through the work of Jesus on the Cross. Based on the combined teaching of two key texts, I believe that such evangelism lacks testimony to a key cosmic element.

Peter’s Evangelistic Testimony about the Life of Christ

In his preaching of the gospel (Acts 15:7) to an unsaved centurion and many others, both of his household and of his close friends (Acts 10:27, 33), Peter testified key information about the life of Christ:

How God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for God was with him (Acts 10:38).

Saying these words, Peter told these lost people how Jesus through the power that God gave Him healed all who were oppressed by the devil. He thus explained to these lost people that multitudes of people were not being oppressed by other sinful humans, but by the devil.

Peter then testified key truths about Jesus’ crucifixion, resurrection, and exaltation (Acts 10:39-42). Finally, he declared to them that all who believe in that Jesus receive forgiveness of their sins (Acts 10:43).

To be saved, his hearers would have had to believe not just about their own sinfulness because he testified to them about Jesus’ delivering humans from the sinful activities of an evil supernatural being. Moreover, they had to believe testimony not only about Jesus’ dying for them to save them, but also about Jesus’ dealings with the sinfulness of the devil before His death.

These lost people, therefore, were not given testimony exclusively about human sinfulness—Peter’s gospel message also emphasized to them the sinfulness of the devil and Jesus’ delivering people from the devil’s sinful actions. 

Paul’s Evangelistic Testimony about the Mission Christ Gave Him

Standing on trial before two unsaved authorities, King Agrippa and Festus (the Roman governor), as well as many other lost people (Acts 25:23), Paul testified to the mission that Christ gave him:

Act 26:15 And I said, Who art thou, Lord? And he said, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest.

 16 But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and of those things in the which I will appear unto thee;

 17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,

 18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

To these powerful lost people, Paul made known that Christ commissioned him to minister to lost Gentiles to turn them from darkness and the power of Satan. Saying this, Paul confronted those who were trying him with their own need of being delivered from the power that Satan was sinfully exercising over them to keep them in darkness!

Paul proceeded to witness to them also about the crucifixion, resurrection, and exaltation of Christ (Acts 26:19-23), just as Peter did before him to other lost people (Acts 10). He then declared how he desired that all the lost people who were present at his trial would become Christians (Acts 26:24-29)!

In his gospel preaching to many lost people on this occasion, Paul testified not just to human sinfulness but also to the sinful activities of the devil. He also spoke to them not just about Jesus’ death, but also of Jesus’ work of delivering people from Satan’s sinful activities through His sending Paul to minister to them to that end.

Conclusion

From these two accounts of apostolic evangelism, we learn that our evangelism needs to have a cosmic element to it—testimony to the sinfulness not just of humans, but also to the sinfulness of the devil, a supernatural being! Moreover, we need to testify not just about Jesus’ dying for people on the Cross but also about His delivering people through His other dealings with the sinfulness of Satan.

The gospel that we should give to others includes the good news that God through Jesus has dealt with the sinfulness of both humans and evil spirit beings! Let us follow Peter and Paul in evangelism by adding this key cosmic element to our witnessing.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Gospel
 permalink

"The Just Shall Live Faith: A Faith That Works" — Lesson VIII (7/21/13)

July 21, 2013

The Use of Habakkuk 2:4 in Galatians 3:11 and the Issue of Legalism Among the Galatians

The key text for our Sunday school series is Habakkuk 2:4. We have been examining biblical teaching in key passages to understand more about how those who are the just who live by faith have a faith that works.

The NT uses Habakkuk 2:4 three times (Rom. 1:17; Gal. 3:11; Heb. 10:38). Interestingly, the three books in which the noun faith occurs more than any other books in the NT are those same books: Romans (39x), Hebrews (32x), and Galatians (21x).

Introduction to Galatians

Paul preached to the Galatians as part of his gospel ministry on his first missionary journey (Acts 13-14). Notice how Paul ends his gospel message in a synagogue in Antioch of Pisida by using Habakkuk 1:5 to warn his hearers to accept the good news that justification is by faith in Jesus and not by the works of the Law (Acts 13:38-41)!

Later, Paul preached the gospel to some pagan idolaters in one of the cities of Galatia (Acts 14:15-17). Notice that his preaching the gospel to them corresponds to his later ministry to idolaters in Athens (Acts 17:16-31) and to his key testimony about his practice everywhere of challenging everyone to turn to God (Acts 26:20).

At the end of his missionary journey, Paul returned to Antioch (Acts 14:26-28). Acts 15:1-2 record the events that then took place that likely led to Paul’s writing the book of Galatians.

Paul probably wrote Galatians in about 49 AD or so, just before the Jerusalem Council, which we studied carefully from Acts 15. Galatians is one of the key books in Scripture about the gospel (Romans has the word 10x; Galatians has it 11x).

Its purpose is to refute legalism. The theme of the book is “grace as the basis for salvation” (New Testament Introduction, 6).

Paul wrote to deal with the Galatians because he was amazed at how soon after they had been saved they were being tempted to go after false teaching about the gospel (Gal. 1:6). Some false brethren (Gal. 2:4) had troubled them and were seeking to pervert the gospel of Christ (Gal. 1:7).

Introductory Considerations for Properly Understanding Galatians 3

Galatians 3 is one of the most important chapters about faith in Scripture: the word faith occurs 14x in the chapter and refers to genuine faith every time (only Heb. 11 has more occurrences – 24). Moreover, because 10 of the 11 occurrences of gospel in Galatians come before 3:11, we know that 3:11 comes in connection with intense teaching about the gospel (cf. esp. Gal. 3:8).

How then does Paul use Habakkuk 2:4 in Galatians 3:11 to refute legalism? To answer this question, we need to consider briefly the preceding teaching in Galatians 2:11-21.

Paul’s Confrontation of Peter Concerning Hypocrisy That Was Contrary to the Truth of the Gospel

Galatians 2:11-21 records Paul’s confronting Peter after he came to Antioch (Gal. 2:11). Because he feared certain men who came from James, Peter and others who were misled because of his influence were acting hypocritically in a way that was contrary to the truth of the gospel (Gal. 2:12-14).

To rebuke Peter, Paul explained the truth about how people are justified by faith in Christ and not by the works of the Law (Gal. 2:15-19). He also emphasized that he (Paul) had died through the Law so that he might live to God (Gal. 2:19).

Strikingly, Paul then directly linked his justification by faith with his continuing living by faith (Gal. 2:20). He ends this section by emphasizing that he does not nullify the grace of God by holding that justification is through the Law because that would mean that Christ died needlessly (Gal. 2:21).

What Kind of Legalism is Galatians 3 Addressing?

Galatians 3 is certainly Pauline teaching that refutes legalism, but what kind of legalism is it addressing? Many today believe that Galatians 3:3 has in view legalism concerning sanctification.

Does Paul’s flow of thought in Galatians 3 that leads to his use of Habakkuk 2:4 in 3:11 support this belief? Many considerations about Galatians 3 argue against this belief.

First, Paul used very intense language (Gk. “O” [Gal. 3:1]; “foolish” [Gal. 3:1, 3] to refute a very severe error, which would not be fitting if he were dealing with an erroneous view concerning sanctification. Rather, he was rebuking the Galatians about their serious departure from vital teaching about justification by faith (Gal. 2:15-20).

Second, Paul’s subsequent argumentation in Galatians 3:1-14 does not support holding that he was addressing an error concerning sanctification in Galatians 3:3. It does not do so because the key truth that Paul focused on is how the Galatians received the Holy Spirit (Gal. 3:2; cf. 3:5, 14)—either it was through faith or it was through the works of the Law, but it was not both!

He then challenged them whether they were being perfected by the flesh after having begun in the Spirit (Gal. 3:3). Comparing what Paul says here with the issue that led to the Jerusalem Council proceedings (Acts 15:1, 4, and 5), we understand that when Paul spoke of their being perfected by the flesh, he had in mind that they would be circumcised after they had received the Spirit and then would be directed to keep the Law of Moses.

Furthermore, Paul challenged them about their suffering many things (Gal. 3:4), which does not fit with the view that he was dealing with legalism about sanctification—would there have been legalistic Christians who were actually persecuting these new believers for not having a right view of sanctification? No, clearly, Paul was talking about those who persecuted them because they had believed that they had been justified by faith without being circumcised and keeping the Law of Moses (cf. Acts 13:50; 14:2, 5, 19, 22).

The close parallel between Paul’s teaching in Galatians 3:5 and the apostles’ teaching at the Jerusalem Council (Acts 15:8, 12) shows that Paul was addressing the same error here that that Council would deal with a short time later. Just as the Council, of which Paul was a part, later conclusively concluded that the Gentiles were saved by faith without circumcision and keeping the works of the Law, so Paul argued for the same truth here (Gal. 3:5).

Paul then further supported that justification is by faith without the works of the Law by arguing for that truth from Scriptural teaching about Abraham’s reception of the gospel promise (Gen. 15:6; 12:3) when he was not circumcised and long before the Law had been given (Gal. 3:6-10). He then explained that the Law itself validates that justification is by faith today as it was with Abraham (Gal. 3:9-10).

Paul then cited Habakkuk 2:4 as conclusive and plain Scriptural evidence that no one is justified by the Law before God (Gal. 3:11). Note carefully that both here as well as in Romans 1:17 Paul removed the pronoun “his” that is in Habakkuk 2:4.

He then argued from Scripture that there is no possibility of mixing faith and the works of the Law (Gal. 3:12). Finally, he concluded this section by speaking of the redemption that Christ provides for us from the curse of the Law (which we never have or could have fulfilled) in order that in Him the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the Sprit through faith (Gal. 3:13-14).

Paul’s chiastic argument about reception of the Holy Spirit (Gal. 3:2, 14) teaches us that this whole section concerns reception of the Spirit when people are justified by faith (cf. Peter’s emphasis on Cornelius’ reception of the Spirit without any works)! Clearly, then, Galatians 3 is Pauline teaching concerning a legalistic approach to justification, not sanctification.

Conclusion

Those who are just by faith should actively combat those who try to distort the gospel truth that justification is by faith and not by the works of the Law. To do so, they must be solidly grounded in the truths that Paul teaches in Galatians 3.

Furthermore, our study of Galatians 3, including Paul’s use of Habakkuk 2:4 in Galatians 3:11, has shown that Paul was not correcting the Galatians in 3:3 about an erroneous view of Christian sanctification. The common practice in the Church today of using Galatians 3:3 as Scriptural support for calling other Christians “legalists” is therefore illegitimate, and we should not misuse this key text to justify our calling other believers “legalists.”

See the other lessons in this series here.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Exposition, Gospel, Sunday School, Theology
 permalink

“The Just Shall Live by Faith: A Faith that Works” — Lesson VII (7/14/13): Part II

July 20, 2013

The Relevance of Romans 1, 2, and 14 for A Faith That Works

In Part I of this lesson, we examined how Paul used Habakkuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17. In Part II, we consider the relevance that Romans 1, 2, and 14 have (when they are considered together) for our understanding of a faith that works.

Pauline Teaching about Faith in Romans 14

In Romans 14, Paul first challenges believers concerning their making unrighteous assessments about one another (Rom. 14:1-13). He then challenges them about not being an ungodly spiritual influence on others so that they are spiritually harmed (Rom. 14:13-23).

In both sections of Romans 14, Paul stresses the importance of faith. Speaking about receiving weak brethren “in the faith” (Rom. 14:1), he contrasts those who believe one way versus those who believe another concerning some debatable matters (Rom. 14:2). In the latter section, he underscores the need for faith on the part of any believer in everything that he does (Rom. 14:22-23).

The Importance of Romans 14:9

Romans 14:9 is central to Paul’s challenge to believers to stop judging one another and to stop regarding one another with contempt (Rom. 14:10-13a). In a crucial purpose statement, Paul explains that Christ died and rose again in order that “He might be Lord both of the dead and living (Rom. 14:9).

Because the death and the resurrection are the two central elements in Paul’s teaching about the gospel (1 Cor. 15:3-5), we have a vital statement here about the gospel—Christ experienced both key events for the purpose of becoming the God-exalted supreme judicial authority over all. Romans 14:10-12 confirms this interpretation by specifying that the aspect of being Lord over all that Paul has in mind here concerns who is authorized to assess all believers in those debatable areas (as well as in everything else).

He supports his teaching by citing Isaiah 45:23 as Scriptural teaching that all will bow the knee to God and confess to Him (Rom. 14:11). All of us, therefore, will give an account to God (Rom. 14:12).

Paul taught earlier in Romans that God will judge all through Jesus Christ (Rom. 2:16); the same truth is in view in Paul’s purpose statement here (Rom. 14:9) about the death and resurrection of the Christ! Because we all will give an account to Jesus one day, we must stop judging one another (Rom. 14:13).

Only someone who knows the secrets of each person’s heart can judge them righteously—Christ is that God-appointed Judge (Rom. 2:16)! We, therefore, must diligently concern ourselves with not harming others through what we choose to do in debatable areas of our Christian living (Rom. 14:13b).

Whatever we choose to do in such matters must be of faith (Rom. 14:23) because that is the only way we can please God with anything we do (cf. Heb. 11:6). If we do things that we are unsure whether they are right, we sin.

From Romans 1:1-2:16 and Romans 14, we understand that genuine faith in Jesus Christ displays itself in our stopping our judging others hypocritically (Rom. 2:1-5) or without authorization in debatable matters (Rom. 14:1-13) and in our diligence not to cause others spiritual harm through our choices and actions (Rom. 14:13-21). Those who are just by faith must believe that Jesus is the supreme judicial authority who will judge all people, both unbelievers and believers (Rom. 2:16; 14:9-11), and live their lives as believers who are ever mindful of that truth (cf. Rom. 14:13-23).

The Significance of Key Parallels between Acts 17 and Romans 1, 2, and 14

From our study of Acts 17 and Romans 1, 2, and 14, we note many key parallels between what Paul says in both places:

1. Testimony to God as Creator (Acts 17:24; Rom. 1:20)

2. Information about idolatry being wrong (Acts 17:29; Rom. 1:23-25)

3. Explanation about the connection of God’s withholding His judgment and repentance (Acts 17:30; Rom. 2:4-5)

4. Testimony to God’s appointed Day of Judgment as the reason people must repent (Acts 17:30-31; Rom. 2:5)

5. Testimony to God’s appointed Judge (Acts 17:31; Rom. 2:16)

6. Testimony to the relationship between the Resurrection of Jesus and His appointment to be the Judge of all (Acts 17:31; Rom. 2:16; 14:9)

7. Testimony to the gospel significance of Christ as the God-appointed Judge (Acts 17:18-20; cf. 17:30-31; Rom. 1:3-4; 1:16-18; 2:4-16)

These key parallels show that testimony to Christ as the God-appointed Judge was an important part of Paul’s gospel ministry to both unbelievers (Acts 17:30-31; Rom. 2:16) and believers (Rom. 2:16; 14:9-13)! The just who live by faith must have a faith that works by believing and testifying to these same truths to everyone, just as Paul did.

See all the lessons in this series here.

 

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Exposition, Gospel, Sunday School, Theology
 permalink

“The Just Shall Live by Faith: A Faith that Works” — Lesson VII (7/14/13): Part I

July 16, 2013

The Use of Habakkuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17

For the final three weeks of our series, we will examine the three passages in the NT that use Habakkuk 2:4 (Rom. 1; Gal. 3; and Heb. 10). Today, we consider its use in Romans 1:17.

In Part I of this lesson, we will treat the first 48 verses of Romans in this lesson. In Part II, we will examine key related teaching in Romans 14. Doing so, we will discover that Paul’s teaching in Romans correlates directly with key elements of his evangelistic ministry in Athens (Acts 17).

Introductory Aspects of Romans 1:1-2:16

Romans 1:1-2:16 comprises 48 verses that may be considered a unit for two reasons:

(1) The section begins with explicit teaching about the gospel (Rom. 1:1ff.) and ends with another explicit statement about the gospel (Rom. 2:16). Three other references to the gospel (Rom. 1:9, 15, 16) in this section show that the gospel is a key aspect of this section.

(2) The section features at least thirteen clear statements about God as judge (Rom. 1:18, 24, 26, 28, 32; 2:2, 3, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 16). Of these, 2:16 is particularly relevant for our series.

The extensive focus on both the gospel and God as judge in this section signal to us the need to consider closely how Paul relates these two truths here.

Romans 1:1-7

Paul begins Romans by explaining his calling to minister the gospel of God (Rom. 1:1-5). He declares that God promised the gospel beforehand in His holy Scriptures through His prophets (Rom. 1:1-2).

The gospel message concerns God’s Son (“His Son” [Rom. 1:3a]), which shows that it is a message about the One who is uniquely related to God the Father. Paul then declares two key truths about His Son (Rom. 1:3b-4).

Read the full article here.

See all the lessons in this series here.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Exposition, Gospel, Sunday School
 permalink

“The Just Shall Live by Faith: A Faith that Works” — Lesson VI (7/7/13)

July 13, 2013

Pauline Evangelism in Acts 24, 26, and 28

Having examined Pauline evangelism in Acts 17 at length last week, this week we look at it from the records of his ministry in the final chapters of Acts. Comparing all the accounts, we confirm the validity of the previous observations that we have made.

Paul before Felix

A common element in Paul’s defenses recorded by Luke is his emphasis on his being on trial for “the hope and resurrection of the dead” (Acts 23:6; 24:15; 25:19; 26:6, 23; 28:20). This record corroborates the centrality of the resurrection that we observed in Acts 17.

After defending himself publicly before Felix the governor (Acts 24:1-23), Paul had many more private opportunities to speak to him (Acts 24:24-27). Luke specifies that on the first such opportunity, Felix heard Paul “concerning the faith in Christ” (Acts 24:24-25).

On that occasion, Paul “reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come” (Acts 24:25). This record corroborates Paul’s climaxing his witness at Mars Hill with testimony to the judgment to come (Acts 17:30-31).

We thus see that Acts 24 correlates directly with Acts 17 in supporting our understanding that Paul did not “fail” to preach the gospel at Mars Hill. Just the opposite, Paul’s continuing emphasis on the same truths shows that the resurrection and testimony about the judgment to come were central elements in his evangelism about “the faith in Christ” (Acts 24:24).[1]

Paul before Festus and Agrippa

Luke records at length Paul’s defense before Festus the governor and King Agrippa (Acts 25:23-26:29). Paul focused his testimony on his being on trial for the truth that God raises the dead (Acts 26:6, 8, 23).

After testifying to his preconversion persecution of believers (Acts 26:9-12), Paul related how Jesus appeared to him on the road to Damascus to arrest him and confront him about his persecuting Him (Acts 26:13-14). The subsequent record provides vital information about Paul’s commission from Jesus and his evangelistic practice throughout his life.

Paul testified that Jesus appeared to him to make him a minister and a witness (Acts 26:16). He added that Jesus commissioned him to go to the Gentiles (Acts 26:17) to “open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in [Jesus]” (Acts 26:18).

Next, Paul explained his obedience to the heavenly vision (Acts 26:19-23). His explanation provides the most comprehensive statements about his evangelistic ministry that we find anywhere.

In statements that were comprehensive ethnologically, geographically, chronologically, and socioeconomically, Paul highlighted his focus on testifying to aspects of his evangelism that many have missed—“showed . . . that they should repent and turn to God, and do works meet for repentance” (Acts 26:18, 22):

1. Ethnologically – Jews (“them of Damascus and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea”) and Gentiles (“and then to the Gentiles”)

2. Geographically – Where Paul first ministered (“First unto them at Damascus”) and everywhere else thereafter (“them of Damascus and at Jerusalem, and throughout all the coasts of Judaea, and then to the Gentiles”)

3. Chronologically – When Paul began his gospel ministry (“First unto them at Damascus”) right up to his present defense before Festus and Agrippa (“I continue unto this day” [Acts 26:22])

4. Socioeconomically – “witnessing both to small and great” (Acts 26:22)

Paul thus stressed that in his evangelism he demanded that everyone everywhere that he witnessed to throughout his life had to repent and turn to God and do works that showed that they had genuinely repented! His testimony here thus directly corroborates that his emphasis on universal repentance at the climax of his message at Mars Hill (Acts 17:30) was an unchanging element of his entire gospel ministry from its beginning to that very time when he was defending himself before these authorities.

Moreover, Paul made known here something vital that directly confirms the validity of the theme for our entire series—he demanded from all people that those who would be just people who live by their faith (cf. “receive forgiveness of their sins and inheritance among them which are sanctified by which that is in [Jesus]”) have a faith that produces works!

What were the works fitting for repentance that Paul testified to everyone about throughout his life? An analysis of the evangelistic record in the book of Acts shows us that being water baptized after salvation was certainly one of these works (cf. Acts 2:37-38; 10:47-48).

Because Paul is the pattern believer for all other believers (cf. 1 Cor. 11:1, etc.), his being a witness from the beginning of his Christian life (in Damascus; Acts 26:20) right to the end of his life implies that being a witness to others about the faith is another of those works. In support of this observation, we should note how Jesus told the demon-possessed man whom he delivered, “Go home to thy friends, and tell them how great things the Lord hath done for thee, and hath had compassion on thee” (Mark 5:19).

(This sermon provides much more detailed information from Acts 26 about how we are to follow Paul in evangelism.)

Paul in Rome

The ending of Acts provides two key accounts of Pauline evangelism in Rome (Acts 28:17-31). These accounts corroborate another key observation that we made previously in our series.

Twice at the end of Acts, Luke records that Paul was ministering to everyone about both the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 28:23, 31). These statements confirm that the record of all believers in Thessalonica testifying to “another king, one Jesus” (Acts 17:7) was not just something that was true in that isolated setting.

Rather, testimony to the kingdom of God was the central focus of apostolic evangelism from beginning to end in the book of Acts (cf. Acts 2, 8, 10, 17, and 28). These concluding statements about Paul’s evangelistic ministry in Rome with everyone show that the gospel did not “change” from being a message about the kingdom of God and Jesus Christ to being a message just about Christ! (See this post for more information about this key point.)

 

[1] Concerning his witness to Felix, Bock concludes that “Jesus’s role as exalted judge is apparently a major point” (Acts in ECNT, 695).

See the rest of the posts in this series here.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Exposition, Preaching, Sunday School
 permalink

“The Just Shall Live by Faith: A Faith that Works” — Lesson V (6/30/13); Part II

July 6, 2013

Pauline Evangelism in Acts 17

In Part I of Lesson V, we examined three major truths that the Cornelius accounts teach us about how people are and are not saved. To profit fully from Part II of Lesson V, I encourage you to be sure that you have first read all of the preceding posts in this series (you can read them here).

In Part II of Lesson V, we consider Acts 17 closely to understand more about how lost people become those who are just people who live by faith. Acts 17 records Pauline evangelism in three cities, Thessalonica, Berea, and Athens. Comparing the three accounts brings out important truths about Pauline evangelism.

I. Pauline Evangelism in Thessalonica

Reasoning with Jews in a synagogue for three Sabbaths, Paul testified to them from Scripture that Jesus was the promised Christ who had to suffer and rise from the dead (Acts 17:1-3). Many were saved through his ministry (Acts 17:4), but unbelieving Jews responded to his ministry by persecuting the believers (Acts 17:5-9).

Through his recording the Jews’ complaint to the city authorities about the message that all the believers were testifying of “another king, one Jesus” (Acts 17:7), Luke informs us about a key aspect of Paul’s message—he preached the gospel of the kingdom of God in Thessalonica! Pauline evangelism, therefore, highlighted that the resurrection of Jesus evidenced that He was the promised Christ who was God’s chosen King.

II. Pauline Evangelism in Berea

Because of the persecution, the brethren immediately sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. Arriving there, they again evangelized Jews in a synagogue (Acts 17:10). Luke highlights that many Bereans believed because they were noble-minded people who received the word with great eagerness and carefully examined the Scriptures to verify the truthfulness of what Paul and Silas had ministered to them (Acts 17:11-12).

In this account, we see again that people become just by faith by wholeheartedly embracing the gospel message that God gives them through His ministers. Although Luke does not say anything about the explicit content of what Paul and Silas ministered to them, the flow of thought as well as Scriptural information elsewhere assures us that they preached the same message in Berea that they did in Thessalonica.

III. Pauline Evangelism in Athens

Because of Jewish persecution arising in Berea, as it did in Thessalonica, the brethren immediately sent Paul away once again (Acts 17:13-15). Arriving in Athens, Paul was continually provoked in his spirit by the profuse idolatry that he witnessed in the city (Acts 17:16).

In response to that continual provocation, he ministered daily to everyone that he encountered (Acts 17:17). By saying that Paul “disputed” (Gk. διελέγετο) with them (Acts 17:17), Luke showed that Paul ministered to them in the same way and with the same message that he did in Thessalonica (cf. “reasoned” [Gk. διελέγετο Acts 17:2-3]) and Berea.

Some Gentile philosophers heard Paul’s “preaching [Gk. εὐηγγελίζετο] Jesus and the resurrection,” but did not understand its meaning (Acts 17:18). Noting this information, Luke informs us what the content of Paul’s reasoning with everyone in Athens was—the gospel message about Jesus and the resurrection.

Because the philosophers did not understand Paul’s gospel message, they brought him to the Areopagus and asked him to explain the meaning of what he was preaching (Acts 17:19-21). They thereby prompted Paul concerning the content of his message that Luke records in Acts 17:22-31.

Many people have misinterpreted Paul’s message at Mars Hill because they have not connected how and why Paul was brought to the Areopagus with the message that he preached there. Properly making that connection shows us that Paul’s message was his explanation of his gospel preaching of Jesus and the resurrection that at least some of his hearers had heard him preach earlier in the marketplace.

Far from being a record of Pauline “failure” in evangelism because of a supposed experimental, philosophical approach that Paul adopted, Acts 17:22-31 is thus vital apostolic instruction to us about how to explain essential truths about the gospel message of Jesus and the Resurrection! 

IV. Key Aspects of Paul’s Gospel Message at Mars Hill

Acts 17:22-31 reveals many vital truths about Pauline gospel preaching:

1. Paul’s message at Mars Hill was profoundly God-centric (16 statements about God in 10 verses).

2. Paul testified climactically about how God’s raising Jesus from the dead was the event that changed God’s posture toward all men everywhere (Acts 17:30-31). Whereas in “the times of ignorance God winked at [overlooked]” their idolatry, He now commands all men everywhere to repent (Acts 17:30-31).

3. Paul testified what God has proven to all men through His raising Jesus from the dead (Acts 17:30-31) – note that Paul’s message climaxes with testimony to essentially the same truth that Peter’s message in Caesarea does (Acts 10:42).

4. Paul declared that God commands all men everywhere to repent because of what He has proven to them through His raising Jesus from the dead (Acts 17:30-31).

Rightly understood from Acts 17:22-31, Paul’s gospel message about Jesus and the resurrection (Acts 17:18), therefore, included his preaching of how God’s raising Jesus from the dead proved to all men everywhere that He has fixed a Judgment Day in which He will judge all men through Jesus, the Judge whom He has appointed. Because God has proven these things to everyone, He demands that everyone repent.

Moreover, Acts 17 shows us that Pauline evangelism everywhere was his preaching of the same message Jesus and the Resurrection. (For a more thorough treatment of this crucial point, you can listen to my messages Another King Jesus and Make Known the True God).

IV. Vital Parallels between Petrine Evangelism and Pauline Evangelism

Paul thus testified to the same key truths at Mars Hill that Peter testified to in Caesarea. Both preached the gospel message about the resurrection of Jesus and its vital significance for all people.

For a more detailed presentation of the many key parallels between Petrine evangelism in Caesarea (Acts 10) and Pauline evangelism in Athens (Acts 17), see my post An Excellent Example of the Value of Comparing Scripture with Scripture.

See all the posts in this series here.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Exposition, Ministry, Preaching, Sunday School
 permalink

“The Just Shall Live by Faith: A Faith that Works” — Lesson V (6/30/13); Part I

July 1, 2013

Learning How People Are and Are Not Saved from the Cornelius Accounts

Through a careful study of Acts 10:1-11:18 and 15:1-33, we learn three major truths about how people are and are not saved.

I. Cornelius was not saved by works.

  1. By being a powerful, wealthy, and  “successful” man in the world (Cornelius was a centurion) – Acts 10:1
  2. By being a devoted, godly man – Acts 10:2
  3. By fearing God – Acts 10:2
  4. By being a good family man who directed his whole household to fear God – Acts 10:2
  5. By giving alms to the Jewish people – Acts 10:2
  6. By praying to God always – Acts 10:2
  7. By having an authentic supernatural experience with a true angel of God – Acts 10:3-5
  8. By being a just man who met his obligations to others – Acts 10:22
  9. By being a model citizen who had a good reputation with his entire nation – Acts 10:22
  10. By having a personal meeting with the top Christ-chosen leader of the apostolic company and doing homage to him – Acts 10:25
  11. By making a long pilgrimage to a holy site – Cornelius did not go anywhere; Peter came to him and preached the gospel to him, and he was saved by believing the message.
  12. By having some prior knowledge about Jesus – Acts 10:37-38
  13. By being baptized – he was saved before he was baptized – Acts 10:44-48
  14. By being circumcised – Acts 15:1, 5
  15. By keeping the Law of Moses – Acts 15:5

II. Cornelius was saved through genuine repentance and faith.

  1. By receiving the word of God – Acts 11:1
  2. By hearing the word of the gospel and believing – Acts 15:7
  3. By God’s baptizing him with the Holy Spirit – Acts 11:16
  4. By God’s granting him repentance – Acts 11:18
  5. By God’s purifying his heart by faith – Acts 15:9
  6. Through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ – Acts 15:11
  7. By God’s visiting him to take him out of the Gentiles to be one of the people for His name – Acts 15:14
  8. By turning to God – Acts 15:19
  9. By receiving the Holy Spirit as a gift from God – Acts 10:45; 11:17; 15:8
  10. By being saved the way the Prophets had spoken about – Acts 15:15-18
  11. By God’s rebuilding the Davidic tabernacle that had fallen – Acts 15:16

III. Cornelius was saved by a repentance and faith that produces works.

  1. Even before he was saved, Cornelius had genuine faith in God that was producing works
    –Based on what he already knew prior to the angel’s appearing to him, he feared God and did what was right (Acts 10:35). By faith, he thus believed that there was a God and diligently sought him (cf. Heb. 11:6).
    –By faith, he believed the angel’s message to him and sent men to summon Peter (Acts 10:7-8).
    –By faith, he gathered his family and close friends to hear Peter’s message (Acts 10:24).
    –By faith, he believed that they were all gathered before God to hear all that God had commanded Peter to say to him (Acts 10:33).
  2. He was saved by genuine repentance and faith that produced the obedience of faith when he heard the gospel message that climactically informed him that everyone who believes in Jesus receives forgiveness of sins (Acts 10:43; 11:18; 15:7).
  3. He was saved by genuine repentance and faith that produced obedience to the command that he was given to be baptized soon after he was saved (Acts 10:48).

See the other lessons in this Sunday school series here.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Interpretation, Ministry, Sunday School, Theology
 permalink

An Excellent Example of the Value of Comparing Scripture with Scripture

June 29, 2013

Acts 10 and 17 record two key accounts of apostolic evangelism of Gentiles. A careful comparison of the accounts reveals a number of important parallels between the two passages. Attention to these parallels provides us with a biblical basis for rejecting a common wrong assessment of the latter account.

1. Both accounts record evangelistic ministry to very religious but unsaved Gentiles.

— Act 10:1 There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band, 2 A devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.

— Act 17:22 Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. 23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you.

2. In unusual ways, lost people directed the evangelists in both accounts to minister to the lost people that they evangelized.

—An angel appeared to Cornelius and told him to send men to summon Peter to come preach to him (Acts 10:3-6; 22; 30-32; 11:13-14). God then gave Peter a perplexing vision followed by the Spirit’s speaking directly to him to direct him to go with the lost men whom Cornelius had sent to him to summon him (Acts 10:9-20).

—Paul was taken to the Areopagus by men who heard him preaching about what they thought were “strange deities” (Acts 17:18-19).

3. Both accounts feature the evangelism of lost authority figures.

—Peter preached to Cornelius, a centurion in Caesarea (Acts 10:1)

—Paul preached at Mars Hill to people who were secular authorities (Acts 17:19).

4. Lost people prompted the evangelists on both occasions concerning what they wanted to hear from them.

—Cornelius explained to Peter how an angel told him to send for him so that he and his entire household would hear from him the words by which they would all be saved (Acts 10:33 cf. 10:22; 11:13-14). He also told Peter that they were all gathered before God to hear all that God had commanded Peter (Acts 10:33).

—The lost philosophers who took Paul to the Areopagus told Paul that they wanted to know what the meaning of his new teaching was (Acts 17:19-20).

5. Both accounts record apostolic proclamation of God’s posture toward all people.

—Peter told Cornelius that God is an impartial Judge who accepts in every nation those who fear Him and work righteousness (Acts 10:34-35).

—Paul told the Athenians that God made all the nations of men of one blood and has predetermined their appointed times and habitation so that they would seek Him (Acts 17:26-27). He also proclaimed that God is now commanding all men everywhere to repent (Acts 17:30).

6. Both accounts emphasize the Father’s work in, for, and through Jesus.

—Acts 10 highlights that the Father anointed Jesus with the Spirit and with power (Acts 10:38), and that He raised Jesus from the dead, showed Him openly, and appointed Him to be the Judge of the living and the dead (Acts 10:40-42).

—Acts 17 underscores God’s determination of a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness by that Man whom He has appointed (Acts 17:31a). It also says that the proof of that fact is that God raised that Man from the dead (Acts 17:31b).

7. The evangelistic messages climaxed on both occasions with truth about the universal vital significance of Jesus as the God-appointed Judge.

—Act 10:42 And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of God to be the Judge of quick and dead. 43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins.

—Act 17:30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: 31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

8. Both accounts emphasize key truths that believers should tell to all people everywhere.

—Peter told Cornelius that Jesus commanded the apostles to preach and solemnly testify that He is the One appointed by God as the Judge of the living and the dead (Acts 10:42).

—Paul told the Athenians that God is now commanding all people everywhere to repent and that God has given all men proof of the vital significance of the resurrection of Jesus in connection with the Judgment Day and Judge that He has appointed (Acts 17:30-31).

9. Both Peter and Paul preached “Jesus and the resurrection” to their hearers.

—Peter preached that the God-resurrected Jesus commanded the apostles to proclaim a specific message and that through belief in that Jesus people receive the forgiveness of their sins (Acts 10:40-43).

—Paul was asked to explain the meaning of his preaching Jesus and the resurrection (Acts 17:18-20). His message at Mars Hill, therefore, was his explanation of his preaching about Jesus and the resurrection that he had preached earlier in the marketplace to at least some of his hearers who were now also present at Mars Hill. When Paul climaxed his message with a declaration about God’s raising a Man from the dead (Acts 17:31), at least some of his hearers thus knew that Jesus was that Man.

These parallels do not support the view that some hold that Paul “failed” in his evangelistic ministry in Athens because he took a philosophical approach with his hearers instead of preaching the gospel about Jesus to them. Rather, a careful comparison of Acts 10 with Acts 17 shows that Peter and Paul preached the gospel to Gentile authorities in very similar ways on these two occasions.

From these two sterling evangelistic accounts, therefore, we should learn many key principles about how we are to evangelize lost people. We should also learn from our analysis of them that thoroughly comparing Scripture with Scripture is vital for a proper interpretation of Scripture.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Evangelism, Gospel, Interpretation, Preaching
 permalink

Do You Have the Proper “Gospel” Hatred of Sins That You Should Have When Ministering to People Who Have Been Defiled By Having Indulged Their Flesh?

May 15, 2013

Certainly, God has called Christians to be loving and compassionate people in our ministries to needy people. Through Jude, however, He instructs us that we must also be people characterized by a proper hatred when we minister the gospel to people who have been defiled by indulging the flesh.

We Must Hate “the Garment Spotted by the Flesh”

Jude teaches believers vital truth about how they are to minister to certain needy people: “And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh” (Jude 23). This text clearly directs believers that they must have a proper hatred of something even while they are engaged in gospel ministry to save such people.

Green provides helpful explanations of this directive:

That is to say, they are to have pity upon even the most abandoned heretic, but to exercise great care while getting alongside him lest they themselves become defiled. They are to retain hatred of sin even as they love the sinner. (Gene L. Green, TNTC, 2 Peter and Jude, 204)

Jude previously spoke about the “flesh” in relationship to the sin of the angels, which was considered to be sexual acts, and of the heretics who had “defiled the flesh” (v. 7-8).
Jude likely has this particular fleshly desire in mind here. Sexual immorality was one of the hallmarks of the heretics’ praxis (vv. 4-8, 11-12, 16, 18), and here Jude envisions the sexual act as staining the tunic. The “stained tunic” is literal, but it becomes a metaphor for the sinful life of those who have fallen into the sins of the heretics. Jude warns those engaged in this rescue operation not to be taken in but to “hate” the stained tunic, which represents the sin itself (Gal. 6:1). Coming close to the situation of the fallen could ensnare those who did not undertake the operation “in fear.” The ones who show mercy should detest the very acts that have ensnared some of the members of the church (John 3:20; Heb. 1:9; Rev. 2:6). (Gene L. Green, ECNT, Jude & 2 Peter, 128)

Hiebert concurs:

Their godly reverence will prompt an attitude of “hating even the garment spotted by the flesh.” The reverent soul can never regard false doctrine or moral pollution as a matter of indifference or of little consequence. “Hating” (misountes) does not prescribe a malicious or antagonistic attitude but rather a proper feeling of aversion and loathing.” (D. Edmond Hiebert, Second Peter and Jude, 291; bold text is in italics in the original)

Moo understands the directive in the same way:

The false teachers and their disciples are following their own “natural instincts” and paying no attention to the Spirit (v. 19). They are producing teaching and behavior that is offensive to God. And, Jude is saying here, it should be equally offensive to believers. They should naturally “hate” such conduct. Even, then, as they act in mercy toward those who have fallen, praying that the Lord may bring them back, they must not overlook in any way the terrible and destructive behavior these people have engaged in. (Douglas J. Moo, NIVAC, 2 Peter, Jude, 289)

As these remarks by various commentators show, believers must hate the sinful acts of fleshy indulgence that people have engaged in.

When we as believers engage in gospel ministry to people who have been defiled by having indulged their flesh, we must have within us a proper hatred of their sinful behavior. We must not be fooled into thinking that showing mercy to people means not at the same time having internal revulsion and loathing for the sins that they have committed. We do not have a proper gospel mindset if we lack such hatred within us for sin when we minister evangelistically.

Loving one’s neighbor does not mean that all we have in our hearts is a love that totally looks beyond the detestable defilement that their fleshly indulgence has wrought upon them. Rather, Jude 23 directs us that when we engage in evangelistic ministry to these needy people, we must have within us both love for people and hatred for their fleshly sins.

Do You Have the Proper “Ick” Response When Ministering Evangelistically to Such Needy People?

A proper gospel mindset when ministering to people who have defiled themselves through indulging their flesh includes having within us an “ick” response to the sins that they have committed that have defiled them. In light of Jude 23, do you have the proper “gospel” hatred of sins that you should have when ministering to people who have been defiled by having indulged their flesh?

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In Discipleship, Evangelism
 permalink