Archives For rajesh

Guitar chords, melody notes (on 4th string), and first stanza in my guitar music format for playing and singing the hymn Begone, Unbelief.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

Updated Music Page!

June 8, 2012

If you play the guitar, you might find some helpful stuff on my updated Music page, which now features the following resources for guitar players:

—Sheet Music: 5 songs and one chord study

—Guitar Chords, Melody Notes, and First Stanza: 10 songs in an easy to play format

—Other Music: 2 simple ensemble pieces in four parts

—Articles: 6 articles to help you play the guitar better

—Instructional Resources: 5 pages that provide instructions about various guitar topics

—Spanish Ministry Resources: 3 songs and a chord chart formatted for use with Spanish music

—Videos: 2 videos of duets featuring classical guitar, Irish low whistle, tin whistle, and uilleann pipes

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

I Will Praise Him! in my guitar music format that provides guitar chords, melody notes, and first stanza of the song.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

As the closing speaker for a missions’ conference in April, I preached this message from Acts 26. May God use it to profit many people to Follow Paul in Witnessing.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

A key aspect of playing guitar well is to know the major diatonic chords in each key. This diatonic chord chart lists the main chords in each key by degree number. The chart is formatted according to the Spanish system of referring to keys (Do, Re, etc.). Using this chart, a guitar player can become very skillful in playing many songs, especially if he has a good ear.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

In His dealings with certain Sadducees who denied the resurrection of the dead (Matt. 22:23-33; Mk. 12:18-27; Luke 20:37-38), Jesus cited God’s statement to Moses as proof that the dead do rise: 

Mar 12:26 And as touching the dead, that they rise: have ye not read in the book of Moses, how in the bush God spake unto him, saying, I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?

 27 He is not the God of the dead, but the God of the living: ye therefore do greatly err.

When God spoke these words to Moses, the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob had been dead for many years, yet God spoke of His being their God:

“God implied that the patriarchs were still alive and that He had a continuing relationship with them as their covenant-keeping God, even though they had died long before. This demonstrates, Jesus concluded, that He is not the God of the dead, in the Sadducean understanding of death as extinction, but of the living. He is still the patriarch’s God which would not be true had they ceased to exist at death, that is, if death ends it all. And His covenant faithfulness implicitly guaranteed their bodily resurrection” (BKC: NT, 163).

Based on Jesus’ use of the OT in His dealings with the Sadducees, it seems that we should also regard three earlier statements as testimony to the resurrection of the dead.

First, in Beersheba, the Lord appeared to Isaac “the same night, and said, ‘I am the God of Abraham thy father: fear not, for I am with thee, and will bless thee, and multiply thy seed for my servant Abraham’s sake’” (Gen. 26:24). Abraham had died some time before this appearance (cf. 25:8), but God spoke of Himself as being Abraham’s God.

Second, in Haran, Jacob had a dream in which he saw a ladder “and, behold, the LORD stood above it, and said, ‘I am the LORD God of Abraham thy father, and the God of Isaac: the land whereon thou liest, to thee will I give it, and to thy seed’” (28:13). Like the earlier reference, this divine utterance testified to the Lord’s being the God of Abraham, who had been dead by this time for some time.

Third, after his father Isaac had died, Jacob came to Beersheba. God appeared to him “in the visions of the night” and said to Jacob, “I am God, the God of thy father: fear not to go down into Egypt; for I will there make of thee a great nation” (46:3).

After God’s repeated testimony to Moses about His being the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob (Ex. 3:6, 15, 16; cf. 3:13), some other divine statements occur that likely should be taken as also at least implicitly communicating the same truth, including the following:

Exo 4:5 That they may believe that the LORD God of their fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath appeared unto thee.

 2Ki 20:5 Turn again, and tell Hezekiah the captain of my people, Thus saith the LORD, the God of David thy father, I have heard thy prayer, I have seen thy tears: behold, I will heal thee: on the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the LORD (cf. Isa. 38:5).

2Ch 21:12 And there came a writing to him from Elijah the prophet, saying, Thus saith the LORD God of David thy father, Because thou hast not walked in the ways of Jehoshaphat thy father, nor in the ways of Asa king of Judah.

 In the NT, aside from Jesus’ dealing with the Sadducees, Stephen’s citation of God’s statement to Moses at the burning bush served to proclaim at least implicitly the truth of the resurrection of the dead to his hostile audience (Acts 7:32).

From the biblical data about our God’s being the God of those have been physically dead for many, many years, including Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and David, we should realize the importance of the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead in Scripture.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

Mark informs us that Jesus evangelized a rich young ruler who asked him what he should do that he might “inherit eternal life” (Mk.10:17). After Jesus’ initially challenged him (Mk.10:18-19), the man showed by his response that he was yet lacking full understanding of his sinfulness (Mk.10:20).

In response, Jesus “beholding him loved him” (Mk. 10:21) and proceeded to evangelize him further but to no avail. Given that this encounter was not some chance event that just happened to take place, we must hold that God sent Jesus into the world to love this sinful man as He did and confront him with the exact information that he needed to be brought to repentance.

Although Jesus confronted this sinful man in love with his need to repent (Mk.10:21), the man left the encounter unrepentant and unconverted (Mk.10:22). Scripture does not give us any more information about him, which leaves us with no indication that he was ever saved. Based on the available data, it seems that we should hold that he was not one of the elect.

On that reading, this passage provides explicit biblical teaching that Jesus loved a man who was not one of the elect. Those who hold that John 3:16 and other similar biblical teaching about the love of God for sinners only applies to the elect should thus at least adjust their theological systems to account for Jesus’ loving this man who from all that we are able to know was not one of the elect.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

Jesus’ evangelizing a rich young ruler is recorded by each of the writers of the Synoptic Gospels (Matt. 19:16-26; Mk. 10:17-27; Luke 18:18-27). Mark’s account reveals a vital facet of Jesus’ evangelism that teaches us key truths about our evangelism:

Mar 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?

 18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

 19 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother.

 20 And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.

 21 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lackest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.

 22 And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.

 This accounts relates how a rich young ruler knelt before Jesus and asked him a question that showed that he had a wrong focus on trying to earn his salvation (“what shall I do”; 10:17). Jesus responded with initial teaching (10:18-19) designed to challenge the young man, to which he responded, “Master, all these have I observed from my youth” (10:20).

Jesus then challenged him in a way that brought him to a decisive point where he would have to repent of his sinfulness (10:21). The young man was saddened by Jesus’ statement that confronted him with his need, and he departed in grief (10:22).

Mark is the only Gospel writer to record a particular aspect of how Jesus responded to this young man’s wrong first response to His evangelizing him: “Then Jesus beholding him, loved him” (10:21a). Amazingly, Jesus responded to this lost young man’s sinfulness by loving him!

The significance of this remarkable response is heightened because the record ends with the young man departing still unsaved. Even though he had been lovingly evangelized by the only perfect Evangelist, this young man failed to repent.

Scripture provides us with no further information about this man, so we have no way to know whether this man was ever saved. We are left with an account that reveals to us that perfect evangelism that included the expression of perfect love from a perfect evangelist still did not result in the salvation of the lost person being evangelized.

Based on this analysis, we learn several important points that should inform our evangelistic endeavors:

1. To be like Jesus in evangelism, we must love the people that we evangelize even though they may respond wrongly to our witnessing to them.

2. Such love must direct us to continue our witness to them in a way that confronts them decisively with their need to repent

3. Even when we faithfully and lovingly evangelize people as best as we can, there is no guarantee that they will respond correctly.

4. Rejection of our efforts to evangelize people lovingly as Jesus did should not be automatically interpreted as failure on our part

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

Many professing Christians today approve of the use of CCM. This article evaluates the propriety of that approval by directing attention to a question that every believer would do well to consider carefully—whether the authors of the Psalms would approve of CCM?

To answer this question, we should keep in mind some facts about the book of Psalms: God inspired a number of men to write the Psalms: David (75); Asaph (12); Solomon (2?); Ethan (1); Heman (1), and Moses (1); [no information or unclear information about the authors of the other 58 Psalms]. Together, these men have given to us the only inspired sacred songbook in existence.

Of these men, at least four were also instrumentalists (David, Asaph, Ethan, and Heman; cf. 1 Chron. 15:19). These four men produced at least 89 of the Psalms, so more than 59% of these inspired songs were written by men who also played musical instruments themselves. The Psalms, therefore, were not merely the product of poets or songwriters inspired by God to write lyrics for inspired songs.

If these inspired songwriters (and sacred instrumentalists) were somehow to hear the CCM of our day, would they approve? To answer this question, we should consider what God has taught us through them.

The first Psalmist teaches us that a man will be blessed (i.e., uniquely favored by God), if he will be characterized in the following dual manner:

1. Negatively, he does not walk in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stand in the way of sinners, nor sit in the seat of the scornful.
2. Positively, he delights in the law (Heb. instruction) of God and meditates therein day and night.

Because the Psalmist begins by characterizing the blessed man negatively with three expressions of what is not true of him, we must understand that these statements are the right place for us to start in answering our question.

To be blessed, we must not walk in the counsel of the ungodly. Our lives must not be lived influenced in any essential way by any ungodly advice, viewpoints, priorities, objectives, and practices.

How does this truth apply to the music that we use for our worship? It teaches us that we must not get our music perspectives or practices from those who are not like God.

CCM, however, was created by professing Christians who chose to incorporate into Christian music a style and type of music invented by ungodly people who created that style specifically for the purpose of promoting ungodliness. Because CCM was therefore created by those who acted contrary to the teaching of Psalm 1:1, which directs us not to live under the influence of the ungodly, we should hold that the Psalmists would not approve of CCM.

Confirmation of this assessment is seen by applying to our question David’s teaching in Psalm 2 about the counsel of the ungodly:

Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together,
against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying,
Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us (2:1-3).

To understand the importance of these statements, we note that the first Psalmist provides no specific information about the counsel of the ungodly. David here thus gives to us the first specific information about that counsel when he teaches us that ungodly men (especially the kings of the earth and the rulers) have taken counsel together to promote rebellion against the authority of Yahweh and His Messiah.

From taking the teaching of Psalms 1-2 together, we learn that the inspired songwriters preeminently warn people about following ungodly counsel that incites and promotes rebellion against God. Applying this principle to music means that these two (if David did not write Psalm 1 as well) Psalmists would not approve in any way of music created by ungodly people for the purpose of promoting rebellion.

The people who created and advanced rock music have openly and repeatedly testified that the music itself—apart from the lyrics—was created for the purpose of promoting rebellion. Rock music, therefore, regardless of what words are sung along with it, is ungodly music because it was created by the ungodly to promote rebellion.

Those who created CCM—as well as those who have since promoted it—have thus advanced the use of music of which the Psalmists clearly would not approve. Because David wrote at least half of the Psalms, he is by far the most important musician spoken of in Scripture. Hence, we do well to give special regard to applying his teaching in Psalm 2 to this issue.

The believer, therefore, should heed the godly counsel of the first Psalmist and of David and categorically reject CCM as well as all other music that weds Christian words with ungodly music styles.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.

Amos 6:1-8 indicts God’s people for their great wickedness at that time in history:

1 Woe to them that are at ease in Zion, and trust in the mountain of Samaria, which are named chief of the nations, to whom the house of Israel came!

2 Pass ye unto Calneh, and see; and from thence go ye to Hamath the great: then go down to Gath of the Philistines: be they better than these kingdoms? or their border greater than your border?

3 Ye that put far away the evil day, and cause the seat of violence to come near;

4 That lie upon beds of ivory, and stretch themselves upon their couches, and eat the lambs out of the flock, and the calves out of the midst of the stall;

5 That chant to the sound of the viol, and invent to themselves instruments of musick, like David;

6 That drink wine in bowls, and anoint themselves with the chief ointments: but they are not grieved for the affliction of Joseph.

7 Therefore now shall they go captive with the first that go captive, and the banquet of them that stretched themselves shall be removed.

8 The Lord GOD hath sworn by himself, saith the LORD the God of hosts, I abhor the excellency of Jacob, and hate his palaces: therefore will I deliver up the city with all that is therein.

C. F. Keil comments on verse 5,

They lie stretched, as it were poured out . . . upon beds inlaid with ivory, to feast and fill their belly with the flesh of the best lambs and fattened calves, to the playing of harps and singing, in which they take such pleasure, that they invent new kinds of playing and singing. . . . Consequently the meaning of ver. 5 is the following: As David invented stringed instruments in honour of his God in heaven, so do these princes invent playing and singing for their god, the belly. (The Minor Prophets in KD, 10:299-300)

D. R. Sunukjian remarks on 6:4-8,

6:4-6. Rather than heed the prophet’s warning of judgment, the leaders of Samaria instead gave themselves to a decadent hedonism. They reclined on expensive beds whose wood was inlaid with ivory (cf. 3:15). At their opulent feasts, they “lounged” on their couches. The Hebrew word for lounge . . . conveys a sprawled stupor of satiation and drunkenness, with arms and legs hanging over the side. They ate gourmet food—choice lambs and fatted calves—the tastiest and tenderest meat they could get. In their drunken revelry they imagined themselves strumming like David as they attempted to improvise music at their parties. Yet they were vastly different from David! Not content to drink wine from goblets, they consumed it by the bowlful. Only the finest lotions would do for their skin.

Their sole concern was for their own luxurious lifestyle. They did not grieve over the coming ruin of Joseph, the Northern Kingdom (cf. 5:6, 15). They had no concern for their nation’s impending doom.

6:7. Therefore they, the first men of the first nation (v. 1), would be among the first to go to exile. Their festivities and drunken stupors would end. The sound of revelry would fade into bitter silence as they headed into captivity. (The Bible Knowledge Commentary: Old Testament, 1443; bold in original)

J. Randolph Jaeggli helpfully explains the great sinfulness of these people:

                They Abandon Themselves to Sensual Enjoyment (vv. 4-7).

                The Israelites who heard Amos’s words of warning were convinced that they were safe from God’s judgment, so they were indulging themselves in every kind of sensual enjoyment available. They were indolent leaders, lounging around while others apparently worked to support their grand lifestyle. They ate only the choicest meat from the best lambs and fattened calves. Verse five says that they “chant to the sound of the viol.” The verb “chant” is parat, to improvise (see Holladay, p. 297). The “viol” (nebel) was some sort of stringed instrument. Music that is undisciplined in its composition and performance appeals to the sensual person of any age. Modern jazz is a good example of improvised music that fits the mood and loose living of those who love this musical genre. The men of Amos’s time were prolific song writers like David, but they certainly lacked his devotion to the Lord. People compose music that is a reflection of their lifestyle. Lyrics either warm the believer’s heart with thoughts of God’s grace or inflame the passions of the unsaved with unseemly accounts of debauched emotions and actions. Feinberg noted that “music which is degrading is a sure sign of an incipient national decline” . . . Not content to consume wine in smaller vessels, Amos’s contemporaries were drinking from bowls (v. 6). The same word for bowl (mizraq) occurs in Exodus 27:3 to describe the basin used to catch the blood of the sacrificial animal at the altar in the tabernacle. If these drunkards were consuming their intoxicating beverages from an item used in the sacrificial system, they were guilty of sacrilege as well as intoxication. Being careful not to miss out on any enjoyment, these gourmet revelers were treating their skin to the finest ointments available. They did not miss anything that would make them feel good.

If there is anything characteristic of our modern age, it is the same quest for sensual pleasure. People today will try anything to fill the void created by the empty pursuit of material prosperity. Money, possessions, and “good times” do not satisfy modern man any more than the people who heard Amos preach. The world system persuades men that they can find happiness in fleshly gratification apart from God. The empty promise leads only to the enslavement of the human heart, as men become addicted to the fulfillment of their own passions. (Biblical Viewpoint: Focus on Amos, 25-26; bold italic heading is bold italic in the original; other text in bold is in italics in the original).

These commentators (as well as others) understand that God’s pronouncements of woe on His people at this time stemmed from their wickedness that included their playing stringed instruments in a way and for purposes that were not pleasing to Him. On this reading, Amos 6:5 speaks strongly to the music debates of our day by being Scriptural teaching that there are ways of playing a stringed instrument and of singing that are a matter of concern to God and that He condemns.

Copyright © 2011-2024 by Rajesh Gandhi. All rights reserved.